Table of Contents Find Classes & Tutoring 24 Hour Tutor GMAT Forums GMAT Home
 Critical Reasoning I: CR Introduction II: Argument Structure III: Reasoning Skills IV: Question Types V: Advanced Question Types 1. Executive Decision Making 2. Paradox Questions 3. Deductive Reasoning 4. Style of Reasoning Questions VI: Sample Questions
 GMAT Prep Course GMAT Guide Contents Application Essay Guide GMAT Essay Guide 5 GMAT CAT Tests GMAT Resources GMAT Classes & Tutoring Use the Test Pacer Essay Grading Service 24 Hour Tutor Support GMAT Home

A paradox is a statement or proposition that seems self-contradictory or absurd, but in reality expresses a possible truth.

These questions present you with a paradox and ask you to resolve it or explain how that contradiction could exist. Paradox questions are rare and more common at the higher difficulty levels. These questions usually contain the keywords explanation, resolve, or account.

Paradox questions often ask you to play the role of a top researcher where you have to reconcile conflicting data.

Here are some examples of the ways in which these questions are worded:

Which of the following, if true, would help to resolve the apparent paradox presented above?

Which of the following, if true, contributes most to an explanation of the apparent discrepancy described above?

Each of the following could help account for this discrepancy, EXCEPT:

Sometimes paradox questions will present two speakers or have some text in bold. The question then asks the user to compare the statements and resolve the conflict.

How to approach paradox questions:

Read the argument and find the apparent paradox, discrepancy or contradiction.

State the apparent paradox, discrepancy or contradiction in your own words.

Use POE (process of elimination). The best answer will explain how both sides of the paradox, discrepancy, or contradiction can be valid. Eliminate answers that are out of scope, or only address one side of the paradox.

Examples
Inflation rose to 5.1% over the 2nd quarter, up from 4.1% during the first quarter of the year, and higher than the 3.3% recorded during the same time last year. However, the higher price index did not seem to alarm Wall Street and stock prices remained steady.
Which of the following, if true, could explain the reaction of Wall Street?

(A) Stock prices were steady because of a fear that inflation would continue.
(B) The president announced that he was concerned about rising inflation.
(C) Economists warned that inflation would persist.
(D) Much of the quarterly increase in the price level was due to a summer drought's effect on food prices.
(E) Other unfavorable economic news had overshadowed the inflation statistics.

Explanation: This is a paradox because the high inflation report would seem to indicate that the stock market should go down.

A fear that inflation would continue (A), an announcement by the president that he was concerned about inflation (B), economists' warnings about inflation (C), and other unfavorable economic news (E) would all tend to cause stock prices to decline and cause alarm on Wall Street.

What we are looking for instead is an explanation that suggests why a high-inflation report would not spook the markets. (D) is most appropriate. If most of the quarterly inflation was due to a rise in food prices caused by a drought, then other prices rose less or no more than in the last quarter. Since the drought is probably a temporary phenomenon, it may be expected that inflation will decline next quarter. This can explain why the stock market was not overly concerned with the high-inflation report.

 800Score.com    244 Fifth Avenue    Suite 2638    New York, NY 10001-7604    1.800.789.0402