![]() |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 6. Comparisons: Comparisons as Parallelism |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparisons are a special case of parallelism. A number of comparison-specific constructions call for you to always express ideas in parallel form. These constructions include:
X or Y can stand for as little as one word or as much as an entire clause, but in every case, the grammatical structures of X and Y must be identical. For example, this sentence violates the rule by mismatching verb forms: “Either drinking or to eat will do.”
This is a comparison governed by the structure Either X or Y, which requires parallelism between X (“drinking”) and Y (“to eat”). Both verbs must be in the same form; because they aren't currently in the same form, one must be adjusted.
Both X and Y are now in the –ing form. While in many cases, you could use two infinitives – to drink and to eat – this particular context calls for two gerunds (verbs acting as nouns).
Here's another example:
This sentence lists two talents
one could possess in a neither/nor format. They are not, however,
in the same form.
In this sentence, a noun is compared
to a verb. Though it's a different kind of mistake than the missing-information
and verb-form errors we've looked at, it should be dealt with in the
same way: by changing one of the forms to match the other.
Both X and Y are now in the same form: an interest and adeptness. These two nouns make the comparison balanced and grammatical.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 800Score.com 244 Fifth Avenue Suite 2638 New York, NY 10001-7604 1.800.789.0402 Feedback |