|
It is currently Wed Apr 25, 2018 2:38 am
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 4 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
questioner
|
Post subject: GMAT Geometry Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 6:55 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 3:15 am Posts: 424
|
Let q represent the integer length of a side of a triangle. If r represents the number of distinct values for q such that we can create a triangle with lengths q, 9, and 13, what is the value of r? A. 5 B. 17 C. 18 D. 22 E. 29
(B) From the triangle inequality rule, the sum of the lengths of any two sides of a triangle must be greater than the length of the third side. So, the three inequalities are q + 9 > 13, 9 + 13 > q, and q + 13 > 9.
The third equation holds for any positive value of q. So solve the first two inequalities for q, so q > 4 and 22 > q. So the value of q is 4 < q < 22.
Since the lengths of the sides of the triangle are of integer value, the lowest possible integer/side can be 5 and the highest possible integer/side can be 21 (q = 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 ..., 19, 20, or 21). So, r, the number of numbers in this set, must equal 21 – (5 – 1) = 17. The correct answer is B. ---------- Why don't you solve the third equation so that -4 < q < 22? (thus becoming 0 < q < 22)
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Gennadiy
|
Post subject: Re: math (test 1, question 22): geometry, inequalities Posted: Mon Feb 21, 2011 7:19 pm |
|
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 2:23 am Posts: 498
|
Solving the third inequality doesn't give us anything new. We know that q > 0 from the original statement.
The range for q must comply with all three inequalities, NOT just some of them. The first inequality, q + 9 > 13, yields q > 4. Therefore in the solution range q must be greater than 4. You can check that q = 1, 2, 3 or 4 do not fit in the first inequality, q + 9 > 13.
The set of all the possible values of q is {5, 6, 7, ... ,20, 21}.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
lizonnat
|
Post subject: Re: math (test 1, question 22): geometry, inequalities Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2011 5:44 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 5:30 pm Posts: 2
|
Ok great thanks, I see it now.
P.s. why is the formula to determine the number of numbers in a set equal to (last number - first number + 1 ) ?
|
|
Top |
|
 |
Gennadiy
|
Post subject: Re: math (test 1, question 22): geometry, inequalities Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2011 6:15 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 2:23 am Posts: 498
|
When we count the number of consecutive integers from m to k inclusive, we use the following formula:
k – (m – 1) I advise you to remember it in this way and here is the explanation:
Imagine we count consecutive integers from 1 to n. It's clear that there are n such integers. (Note, by the way, that n = n – (1 – 1), NOT n = n – 1)
If we number the elements of the set {m, m+1, ..., k – 1, k} by 1, 2, ... the last integer will be k – (m – 1), because any integer that we number an element with is (m – 1) units less than that element.
m, m + 1, m + 2, ..., k – 1, k 1, 2, 3, ... , (k – 1) – (m – 1), k – (m – 1)
Similarly, as with consecutive integers from 1 to n, the're k – (m – 1) such integers.
|
|
Top |
|
 |
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 4 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|