gmat preparation courses

It is currently Thu Dec 14, 2017 12:27 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Critical Reasoning -- Deductive Reasoning
PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 10:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 3:15 am
Posts: 424
In Critical Reasoning -- Deductive Reasoning (http://www.800score.com/content/guidec3IV3.html),
the explanation of rule #5 says that if some A are B then
the below 2 inferences are invalid:

-Some A are not B
-Some B are not A

I am not able to understand the logic behind this. Could
you please explain with some examples? Thanks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Critical Reasoning -- Deductive Reasoning
PostPosted: Tue Apr 10, 2012 11:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 8:22 pm
Posts: 26
Examples definitely help when thinking through deductive reasoning. So let's make up a fake family called the 'Andersons.' That will be 'A' and let's replace 'B' with 'Banker.'

We are told some Andersons are Bankers. Given this, however, we cannot infer that:

Some Andersons are not Bankers
This is an invalid inference because being told "some Andersons are Bankers" leaves open the possibility that all Andersons are Bankers (maybe everyone in the Anderson family really loves banking). If all Andersons are Bankers then it would not be true that some Andersons are not Bankers.

Some Bankers are not Andersons
This is an invalid inference because being told "some Andersons are Bankers" leaves open the possibility that all Bankers are Andersons (maybe this hypothetical takes place in a strange country where only the Anderson family is allowed to run banks). If all Bankers are Andersons then it would not be true that some Bankers are not Andersons.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Critical Reasoning -- Deductive Reasoning
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:12 am
Posts: 1
Thanks Nick. But if in the question stem its stated that only some Andersons are bankers, then why should we assume that all Andersons may be bankers... Shouldn't we just accept the given fact as 100% true that only some A are B and not all A MAY BE B...?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Critical Reasoning -- Deductive Reasoning
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 4:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 27, 2012 8:22 pm
Posts: 26
We are told "some A are B," we are not told "only some A are B" as you suggest. It's critically important not to assume more than exactly what the text says. "Some" does not mean "only some but not all."

So the statement "some A are B" leaves open the possibilty that all A are B. In my explanation I didn't say all A must be B, only that all A could be B, and thus we cannot infer that some A are not B.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group