
It is currently Mon Mar 19, 2018 12:44 pm

View unanswered posts  View active topics

Page 1 of 1

[ 4 posts ] 

Author 
Message 
questioner

Post subject: GMAT Sets (Data Sufficiency) Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 10:20 am 

Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 3:15 am Posts: 424

A set of integers, S, contains more than one element. Is the range of S greater than its mean? (1) S does not contain positive integers. (2) The mean of S is negative.
A. Statement (1) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) by itself is not. B. Statement (2) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) by itself is not. C. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, even though NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient. D. Either statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question. E. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question, meaning that further information would be needed to answer the question.
(B) If S does not contain positive integers, as statement (1) defines, then S contains negative integers and/or zeroes.
If S consists of zeroes only, S = {0, 0, …, 0}, then its range is 0, because all the elements are the same. Besides, its mean is 0 as well, because the sum of the elements is 0. So in this case the mean and the range are equal.
If there is at least one nonzero element in S, then the sum will be negative (because S doesn't contain any positive numbers). The range is always a nonnegative number, so it will be greater than the mean (which is negative).
Therefore statement (1) gives us two possible answers to the main question. Statement (1) by itself is NOT sufficient.
From Statement (2) we know that the mean is negative. Any range is a nonnegative number. Therefore the range is greater than the mean. Statement (2) by itself is sufficient.
Since Statement (1) is insufficient and Statement (2) is sufficient, the correct answer is choice (B).
If this seems too abstract, it helps to pick some numbers, like the set {5, 4, 2}, to see how the range will be greater than the mean. The mean is negative, and the range is 2 – (5) = 7. 
I believe the answer should be E. Statement 2 should be insufficient, because what if the set is {10,15,20}. The range would be 10 and the mean would be 15. In this case the mean is LARGER than its range..


Top 


Gennadiy

Post subject: Re: math (test 4, question 31): sets Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2010 10:37 am 

Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 2:23 am Posts: 498

Let us analyze the proposed set (10,15,20) first.
It's range is 10 – (20) = 10 + 20 = 10. It's mean is ((10) + (15) + (20)) / 3 = 45/3 = 15
10 > 15
The range is greater than the mean.
The range shows how far are the greatest and the least elements apart. Note, that range is always a NONNEGATIVE number, i.e. positive or zero. And it equals zero only if all elements in a set are equal.


Top 


questioner

Post subject: Re: GMAT Sets (Data Sufficiency) Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:10 pm 

Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 3:15 am Posts: 424

I don't seem to understand the explanation. In statement 1, every element of S is negative. If S = {1, 1}, range = 0 and mean = 1. So range > mean If S = {1, 3}, range = 2 and mean = 2. So range > mean How can the mean be zero if every element of S is always negative?


Top 


Gennadiy

Post subject: Re: GMAT Sets (Data Sufficiency) Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 2:28 pm 

Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 2:23 am Posts: 498

Quote: In statement 1, every element of S is negative. Statement (1) tells us that S contains no positive elements, but it still can contain 0, as 0 is an integer and it is neither positive, nor negative. So S can be {0, 0, …, 0}.


Top 



Page 1 of 1

[ 4 posts ] 

Who is online 
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest 

You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum

