It is currently Fri Jan 18, 2019 6:38 am

 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]

 Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ]
 Print view Previous topic | Next topic
Author Message
 Post subject: GMAT Algebra (Data Sufficiency)Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:13 pm

Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 3:15 am
Posts: 424
What is the two-digit positive integer whose tens digit is a and whose units digit is b?
(1) 2a > 3b > 6
(2) a > 2b > 6

A. Statement (1) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) by itself is not.
B. Statement (2) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) by itself is not.
C. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, even though NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient.
D. Either statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question, meaning that further information would be needed to answer the question.

(B) Statement (1) is not sufficient because there are many 2-digit numbers that satisfy the inequality given in Statement (1). For example, both 63 and 53 are possible numbers for ab.
For 63, 2(6) > 3(3) > 6
For 53, 2(5) > 3(3) > 6.
So Statement (1) is not sufficient by itself.

Statement (2) is sufficient by itself. For 2b to be greater than 6, b must be greater than 3. However, b cannot be 5 or greater, because 2b would then be greater than 10, which is impossible because a is a digit.

Therefore, b must be 4, and a must be 9, and the number ab must be 94.

Since Statement (1) is not sufficient, and Statement (2) is sufficient, the correct answer is choice (B).
----------
This does not explain why Statement 2 tells us that a = 9. If b = 4, then the statement merely suggests that 2(4) < 3a, so 8/3 < a, which only tells us that a can be anything between 3 and 9 (the same thing as 6 < 3a).

Top

 Post subject: Re: GMAT Algebra (Data Sufficiency)Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:23 pm

Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 2:23 am
Posts: 498
Quote:
the statement merely suggests that 2(4) < 3a, so 8/3 < a
It is NOT 2(4) < 3a, but 2(4) < a.

So a > 8. Besides, a is a digit, so it must be 9.

Top

 Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending
 Page 1 of 1 [ 2 posts ]

 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]

#### Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

 You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
 Jump to:  Select a forum ------------------ GMAT    GMAT: Quantitative Section (Math)    GMAT: Verbal Section    GMAT: Integrated Reasoning    GMAT: General Questions GRE    GRE: Quantitative Reasoning (Math)    GRE: Verbal Reasoning    GRE: General Questions General questions    Other questions