 It is currently Wed Jul 17, 2019 7:35 pm

 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]

 Print view Previous topic | Next topic
Author Message
 Post subject: GMAT Algebra (Data Sufficiency) Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 8:47 am Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 3:15 am
Posts: 424
Is |x – 1| < 1 for all integers x?
(1) (x – 1)² > 1
(2) x < 0

A. Statement (1) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (2) by itself is not.
B. Statement (2) BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question, but statement (1) by itself is not.
C. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are sufficient to answer the question, even though NEITHER statement BY ITSELF is sufficient.
D. Either statement BY ITSELF is sufficient to answer the question.
E. Statements (1) and (2) TAKEN TOGETHER are NOT sufficient to answer the question, meaning that further information would be needed to answer the question.

(D) If we take the square root of both sides of the inequality in Statement (1), we get:
|x – 1| > 1.

This tells us that 1 is definitely not greater than |x – 1|, so Statement (1) is sufficient.

Remember: When you take the square root of a variable expression that has already been squared, you must take the absolute value of the squared expression in the process. A simple example is a² = 9. Let’s solve this:
a² = 9
|a| = 3
a = 3 or a = -3.

The same rule holds when dealing with inequalities, as we saw above.

The easiest way to evaluate the sufficiency of Statement (2) is probably to pick numbers. We are told that x is negative.

If x = -1, then the question becomes:
Is 1 > |-1 – 1|?
Is 1 > |-2|?
Is 1 > 2? The answer is NO.

If x = -2, then the question becomes:
Is 1 > |-2 – 1|?
Is 1 > |-3|?
Is 1 > 3? Again, the answer is NO.

The answer will always be NO if x is negative. The more negative the value of x, the greater the value of |x – 1|. So Statement (2) is also sufficient.

Since both statements are sufficient individually, the correct answer is choice (D).

Top Post subject: Re: math: algebra, inequalities Posted: Wed Aug 04, 2010 9:19 am Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 2:23 am
Posts: 498
We have three different inequalities in the question statement. Let us solve each one and draw the answer on the number line.

The first inequality is:
|x – 1| < 1
-1 < x – 1 < 1
0 < x < 2

The second inequality is:
(x – 1)² > 1
|x – 1| > 1
x – 1 > 1 or x – 1 < -1
x > 2 or x < 0

The third inequality is
x < 0

We see that shaded area that represents possible values of x for the first inequality doesn't intersect with others. So both statements will give a definite "NO". (You may think of it as if we pick any number from the shaded area on second or third picture it will not be in the shaded area on the first one).

That means that both statements are sufficient on their own.

Furthermore if we had a situation when shaded region for the first inequality partly overlapped with another one then it would mean that corresponding statement is insufficient.

If we had a situation when shaded region for the first inequality completely enclosed another one then it would mean that corresponding statement sufficient (It will give a definite "YES").

 Attachments: inequality3.gif [2.17 KiB] Not downloaded yet inequality2.gif [2.32 KiB] Not downloaded yet inequality1.gif [2.35 KiB] Not downloaded yet
Top Display posts from previous: All posts1 day7 days2 weeks1 month3 months6 months1 year Sort by AuthorPost timeSubject AscendingDescending

 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]

#### Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

 You cannot post new topics in this forumYou cannot reply to topics in this forumYou cannot edit your posts in this forumYou cannot delete your posts in this forumYou cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
 Jump to:  Select a forum ------------------ GMAT    GMAT: Quantitative Section (Math)    GMAT: Verbal Section    GMAT: Integrated Reasoning    GMAT: General Questions GRE    GRE: Quantitative Reasoning (Math)    GRE: Verbal Reasoning    GRE: General Questions General questions    Other questions 