![]() |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 3. Parallelism: Lists of Verbs and Parallel Constructions |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This is a list of activities – more specifically, activities undertaken by Patty. Parallelism dictates that all
the things Patty did must be in the same form. Since "all
the things Patty did" are verbs, they must
agree in tense and number. Do they?
This graphic identifies each verb form in the sentence: there are two singular, simple past tense verbs (ate and drank) and one singular, past progressive verb (was dancing). Because the verbs are placed together in a list, this cannot be correct. The verbs should all match:
This version correctly changes the mismatched past progressive verb, was dancing, to the simple past tense, danced, so that it matches the tense of the other verbs in the list, ate and drank. This sentence now exhibits proper parallelism.
Here's another example using a list of gerunds:
The verb "to program" must be changed to "programming," because the rest of the verbs are already in the -ing form. You'll often see lists of infinitives on the GMAT. These are the "to ___" verbs (to walk, to talk, to eat, to chat, to drink…). With infinitives, a very simple rule applies: the word "to" must either go either only before the first verb in the list, or before every verb in the list. For example:
The first two sentences are equally acceptable
variations. The third sentence is incorrect because it lacks consistency; the verb changes from to swim to sail, and then back to to dance. This
violates the rules we've laid out.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 800Score.com 244 Fifth Avenue Suite 2638 New York, NY 10001-7604 1.800.789.0402 Feedback |